Maximum union-free subfamilies
نویسندگان
چکیده
An old problem of Moser asks: what is the size of the largest union-free subfamily that one can guarantee in every family of m sets? A family of sets is called union-free if there are no three distinct sets in the family such that the union of two of the sets is equal to the third set. We show that every family of m sets contains a union-free subfamily of size at least √4m + 1 − 1 and that this bound is tight. This solves Moser’s problem and proves a conjecture of Erdős and Shelah from 1972. More generally, a family of sets is a-union-free if there are no a + 1 distinct sets in the family such that one of them is equal to the union of a others. We determine up to an absolute multiplicative constant factor the size of the largest guaranteed a-union-free subfamily of a family of m sets. Our result verifies in a strong form a conjecture of Barat, Füredi, Kantor, Kim and Patkos. ∗ Research supported by a Simons Fellowship and NSF grant DMS-1069197. ∗∗ Research supported in part by a Samsung Scholarship. † Research supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1101185, NSF CAREER award DMS-0812005 and by a USA–Israeli BSF grant. Received January 10, 2011
منابع مشابه
Regular union and cover free families
A family of subsets F of an n-set is r-union-free, if the unions of at most r-tuples of the elements in F are all different. F ⊆ 2 is r-cover-free, if no set in F is covered by the union r others. In this paper we give new bounds on the maximum size of these families in the regular case. In coding theoretical setting union-free families and cover-free families correspond to superimposed designs...
متن کاملOn external contextual grammars with subregular selection languages
In this paper, we study the power of external contextual grammars with selection languages from subfamilies of the family of regular languages. If we consider families Fn which are obtained by restriction to n states or nonterminals or productions or symbols to accept or to generate regular languages, we obtain four infinite hierarchies of the corresponding families of languages generated by ex...
متن کاملApproximate Inclusion - ExclusionNathan Linial
The Inclusion-Exclusion formula expresses the size of a union of a family of sets in terms of the sizes of intersections of all subfamilies. This paper considers approximating the size of the union when intersection sizes are known for only some of the subfamilies, or when these quantities are given to within some error, or both. In particular, we consider the case when all k-wise intersections...
متن کاملNew Bounds for Union-free Families of Sets
Following Frankl and F uredi [1] we say a family, F , of subsets of an n-set is weakly union-free if F does not contain four distinct sets A, B, C, D with A[B = C [D. If in addition A[B = A[C implies B = C we say F is strongly union-free. Let f(n) (g(n)) be the maximum size of strongly (weakly) union-free families. In this paper we prove the following new bounds on f and g: 2 f(n) 2 and g(n) 2...
متن کاملWeakly Union-free Twofold Triple Systems
In this paper, we settle a problem of Frankl and Filredi, which is a special case of a problem of Erdt~s, determining the maximum number of hyperedges in a 3-uniform hypergraph in which no two pairs of distinct hyperedges have the same union. The extremal case corresponds to the existence of weakly union-free twofold triple systems, which is settled here with six definite and four possible exce...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1012.3127 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010